Recent Executive Orders on DEI Raise Concerns at Pitt-Greensburg

Recent executive orders targeting Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) initiatives have raised concerns across Pitt-Greensburg’s campus. The Insider spoke to two campus leaders about the potential impacts on the University’s DEI efforts.

Zakery Wiles, a junior studying political science and public policy, and Roland Woods, assistant dean of students and the university’s civil rights and Title IX liaison, as well as director of DEI, shared their insights on the matter.

Wiles, vice president of the Student Government Association (SGA) and a member of the President’s Committee for DEI, said these orders could disrupt existing DEI programs. The executive order, titled “Ending Illegal Discrimination and Restoring Merit-Based Opportunity,” mandates that federal agencies eliminate DEI initiatives, revokes several past executive orders supporting diversity in government and education, and requires federal contractors and institutions receiving federal funding to comply with stricter civil rights laws. Wiles argued that these measures threaten established programs that promote inclusivity on campus.

“It’s going to hurt the initiatives we already have in place, especially when our campus has dealt with racially targeted incidents,” he said, referring to recent anonymous messages targeting students of color. “Getting rid of inclusivity efforts won’t help anyone.”

Wiles also highlighted the intersection of DEI initiatives and LGBTQ+ advocacy on campus. As SGA vice president, he said the organization has worked to create a safe space for students and will continue to do so, including collaborating with the Counseling Center to provide stress-relief resources and organizing an upcoming spring conference to educate the community on diversity.

“Outside political influences could make simple acts, like displaying representative flags, a point of contention,” he said.

Woods reflected on his background in DEI work, citing his upbringing in a diverse community in South Oakland, Pittsburgh, and his years of nonprofit and community-focused roles. He emphasized that while the university must comply with federal mandates, its focus remains on fostering inclusivity.

“We can continue to do the work that benefits our campus,” Woods said. “But we have to proceed with caution, removing specific language or abbreviations while ensuring impactful initiatives remain.”

Both leaders acknowledged the challenges posed by the emphasis on meritocracy in the executive orders, which conflicts with DEI’s goal of leveling the playing field.

“DEI is about creating opportunities for everyone to thrive,” Woods said. “It’s difficult for some to accept that, but it’s necessary.”

Despite these challenges, Woods remains hopeful, emphasizing the role of student leaders in the President’s Committee for DEI.

“There’s hope that these young adults will continue this work and create spaces where everyone can thrive and be their authentic selves,” he said. “The legacy they build will benefit future students for years to come.”

Reflecting on past challenges, Wiles recalled the 2020 controversy surrounding the Black Lives Matter flag flown on campus, which led to restrictions on symbolic displays by student organizations.

“Executive orders like these are meant to scare people, and that’s exactly what they’re doing,” he said. “Students, especially minorities, are left feeling less safe and more isolated.”

Despite these setbacks, Wiles expressed optimism about the power of student and faculty advocacy. He highlighted the committee’s role as a “liaison” between students and administration, ensuring that concerns like the recent targeted texts are addressed.

“Faculty don’t see everything, so educating them on issues they might not want to hear about is crucial,” he said.

The committee has already made adjustments due to federal policies, including removing “DEI” from its official name to comply with the executive orders. However, its mission will remain the same.

“We’re not stopping,” Wiles said. “These challenges only deepen our commitment to creating a campus where everyone feels included and valued.”